Calcutta High Court

CRM (NDPS)/2088/2026 of SHIBA MANDAL @ SHEVA MANDAL @ KALU MANDAL @ SHEVAKALU MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 33 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 2088 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak PSCase No. 2092 of 2025 dated 23.12.2025 u/s 21(c)/27A/29 of the NDPS Act.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

08.10.2026 Serial no. 33 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)

CRM (NDPS) 2088 of 2026

In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak PSCase No. 2092 of 2025 dated 23.12.2025 u/s 21(c)/27A/29 of the NDPS Act.

-And-

In the matter of : Shiba Mandal @ Sheva Mandal @ Kalu Mandal @ Shevakalu Mandal

… … Petitioner(s)

Mr. Biswajit Tiwari

… for the Petitioner(s)

Ms. Arushi Rathore Mr. Bankim Pal

… for the State-respondent(s)

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been foisted with the present criminal case only on the basis of statement of a co-accused and the other accused from whom recovery has been effected has been granted bail. State opposes the prayer for bail but is unable to dislodge the locus of the present petitioner relating to his complicity in the aforesaid offence. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner be released on bail by the learned Special Court on the same terms and conditions as was imposed upon Biman Mandal in CRM (NDPS) 1024 of 2026.

2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner [Shiba Mandal @ Sheva Mandal @ Kalu Mandal @ Shevakalu Mandal] is Allowed. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 2088 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered as final opinion on the merits of the case. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead