Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/2090/2026 of SUBRATA DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
no. 35 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 2090 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Santiniketan PS Case No. 216 of 2023 dated 22.12.2023 u/s 20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 of the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026 Serial no. 35 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (NDPS) 2090 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Santiniketan PS Case No. 216 of 2023 dated 22.12.2023 u/s 20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 of the NDPS Act
-And-
In the matter of : Subrata Das
… … Petitioner(s)
Mr. Sanjay Mazoomdar
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kallol Mondal, PP Mr. Anamitra Banerjee Mr. Utsav Dutta
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the driver of the vehicle and has been granted bail. The petitioner happens to be the owner of the vehicle. State submits a report reflecting no criminal antecedents of the present petitioner. The petitioner is in custody for more than two years nine months. Having regard to the ground on which other accused person has been granted bail, I am of the opinion that same principle will supply to the present petitioner also. The petitioner be released on the same terms and conditions as was imposed upon Tathagata Roy in CRM (NDPS) 1762 of 2026.
2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner [Subrata Das] is Allowed. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 2090 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered as final opinion on the merits of the case. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)