Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2053/2026 of JAYANTA DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
ct 33 C.R.M.(M) No. 2053 of 2026 sl no. 25 cm In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Jangipur Cyber Crime Police Station Case No. 10 of 2025 dated
08.10.2026
ct 33
C.R.M.(M) No. 2053 of 2026
sl no. 25
cm
In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Jangipur Cyber Crime Police Station Case No.
of dated
18.02.2025
Sections
111(2)(b)/316(2)/318(2)/318(4)/319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
And
Rejected
In Re : Jayanta Das.
….. petitioner
Mr. Prasanjit Debnath
Mr. Amritansu Sengupta
Mr. Rahul Kumar Kanti
…… for the petitioner
Mr. ……… (Name Not supplied)
…… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner seeks for renewal for bail subsequent to rejection of prayer for bail vide order dated 22nd April, 2026 passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in CRM(M) 897 of 2026.
2. The learned advocate representing the State submitted the petitioner to be a habitual offender being indulgent in similar offence on earlier occasions endorsing antecedents, incriminating in nature being implicated earlier on several occasions.
3. Considering the narrative of the complaint, the materials in the case diary, the statements of the learned counsel representing the respective parties and in absence of noticeable subsequent development after rejection of bail
vide order dated 22nd April, 2026, this Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
4. The memo of evidence filed by the State be taken on record.
5. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 2053 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)