Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3276/2026 of SAIKH MUSARRAF HOSSAIN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
no. 15 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional Appellate Side CRM ( A )/3276/2026 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
08.10.2026
Serial no. 15
Anticipatory bail
[Rejected]
Dd
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional
Appellate Side
CRM (A)/3276/2026
In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nalhati Police Station Case No. 185 of 2026 dated 16.04.2026
under
Sections
223/329/115(2)/
117(2)/108/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of : SAIKH MUSARRAF HOSSAIN
… …Petitioner
Ms. Satabdi Das, Advocate
… … For the Petitioner
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das,ld. APP
Mr. Amal Kumar Dutta,
Mr. Supreem Naskar, Advocate
… …For the States
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner is guilty of suppression of material fact. Petitioner approached the jurisdictional Court for anticipatory bail which was rejected. The petition does not contain any averments with regard thereto. This fact is pointed out by the learned advocate appearing for the State.
2. In an incident of assault one of the persons suffered nasal bone fracture injury.
3. Considering the conduct of the petitioner before this Court which is not appreciated and considering the materials in the case diary, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
5. CRM (A)/3276/2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) DEBABRATA DAS Digitally signed by DEBABRATA DAS Date: 2026.10.09 18:12:24 +05'30'