Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3264/2026 of DEBABRATA MONDAL AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
DL-7 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Rejected) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. ( A ) 3264 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with GR
08.10.2026
DL-7
Court No.37
[Bench ID-265691]
(AD)
(Rejected)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M. (A) 3264 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with GR Case No.1356 of 2026 arising out of Minakhan Police Station Case No.88 of 2026 dated 17.03.2026 under Sections 329(3) /115(2) /117(2) /109
/351(2)/103(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, presently pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas.
And
In the matter of: Debabrata Mondal & Ors.
….petitioners
Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra, Advocate
Mr. Satadru Lahiri, Advocate
Mr. Safdar Azam, Advocate
Mr. Poulam Dey, Advocate
…for the petitioners
Mr. Sayak Chakraborty, Ld. Jr. Govt. Advocate Mr. Sunil Gupta, Advocate
… for the State
Mr. Kallol Kr. Basu, Advocate
Md. Jannat ul Firdous, Advocate
… for the de facto complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.
2. A person expired after suffering injuries in an incident of assault.
3. The petitioners are implicated as persons who participating in such incidents.
4. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners claims that, two other persons are in custody and that they are the principal accused.
5. Materials in the case diary place each of the petitioners before Court at the place of occurrence and at the time of occurrence.
2
6. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, it cannot be said that there is fatal delay in lodging of the FIR.
7. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners in the incident, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
8. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.
9. C.R.M. (A) 3264 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.09 11:25:27 +05'30'