Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3402/2026 of TANMOY POREL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 80 (Anticipatory bail) (Allowed) ( Dd ) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional Appellate Side CRM ( A )/3402/2026 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

08.10.2026

Serial no. 80

(Anticipatory bail)

(Allowed)

( Dd )

In the High Court at Calcutta

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional

Appellate Side

CRM (A)/3402/2026

In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438

of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mohanpur Police Station Case No. 192 of 2026 dated 02.09.2026 under Sections 323/34/384/427/506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 pending before lld. ACJM, Barrackpore.

-And-

In the matter of : TANMOY POREL

… … Petitioner

Mr. Debasis Kar, Advocate

… … For the Petitioner

Mr. Utttam Kr. Mondal , Advocate

… …For the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. There is no criminal antecedent so far as the petitioner is concerned.

2. Allegation of extortion relates to the year 2021. FIR was lodged in the year 2026.

3. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer once in

2 a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

5. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

6. CRM (A)/3402/2026 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead