Calcutta High Court
WPA/22407/2026 of NASIUR RAHAMAN Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 8 October 2026
Ct. No. 42 Moumita WPA/22407/2026 Nasiur Rahaman VS Union of India & Ors. Adv. Mr. Saikat Debnath … for the petitioner Adv. Mr. Kaustav Seal … for the State Adv. Ms. Anamika Pandey …for the E.C.I. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
147
08.10.2026
Ct. No. 42
Moumita
WPA/22407/2026
Nasiur Rahaman
VS
Union of India & Ors.
Adv. Mr. Saikat Debnath
… for the petitioner
Adv. Mr. Kaustav Seal
… for the State
Adv. Ms. Anamika Pandey
…for the E.C.I.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having EPIC No. WSC2625820 has preferred an appeal against deletion of her name in the SIR process before the designated Appellate Tribunal.
2. The petitioner prays for expeditious disposal of the said appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the Election Commission of India submits that huge number of appeals pending before the learned Appellate Tribunal, are being disposed of on a day-to-day basis.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order.
6. WPA 22407 of 2026 is disposed of.
7. There shall be no order as to costs.
8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities.
(UDAY KUMAR, J.)