Calcutta High Court
WPA(P)/453/2026 of TANUTOSH DAS ADIKARI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 7 October 2026
No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.DL/11 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION Saikat APPELLATE SIDE Mukherjee WPA(P) / 453 /202 6 TANUTOSH DAS ADIKARI ]… Petitioner Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS ]… Respondents Appearance: Mr. Sayan Banerjee
Ct. No.1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Item No.DL/11
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
Saikat APPELLATE SIDE
Mukherjee
WPA(P)
/ 453
/202
TANUTOSH DAS ADIKARI
]… Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS
]… Respondents
Appearance:
Mr. Sayan Banerjee
…………………….. Advocates for the Petitioner
Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, A.A.G. with Mr. D.N. Ray, G.P., Mr. Ajit Kumar Mishra, A.G.P., Ms. Amrita Pandey, Ms. Sharda Sha and Mr. Gopal Krishna Sarkar, Advocates for the Respondent-State
CORAM
:
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, CJ.
&
OM NARAYAN RAI, J.
DATE
:
7th October, 2026.
ORDER (Per Court)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. On 21.09.2026, we had passed the following order: “1. The Petitioner claims to be a social worker and has filed this PIL petition.
2. We find from Page 33 that a proceeding in the same cause is pending before the Learned S.D.M. at Kakdwip, South 24 Parganas. We wish to note whether the proceedings are still pending.
3. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner himself is a party to the said proceedings and the proceedings are disposed off. We wish to see an order of the concerned authority.
4. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that he would produce the order of disposal of the said proceedings, on the next date.
5. List this petition on 7th October, 2026 for further hearing and passing of orders in the Urgent Supplementary Board.”
2. Today the Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has placed on record a Supplementary Affidavit dated 7th October, 2026, (13 pages). The same is marked as ‘X-1’ for identification.
3. We find from ‘X-1’ that the earlier proceeding initiated by the Petitioner before the Learned S.D.M, Kakdwip, South 24-Parganas bearing
M.F. no.296 of 2015, was dismissed for non-prosecution, on 11.05.2017. In the same cause, this PIL has been filed.
4. We expressed our disinclination.
5. The Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition.
6. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn on instructions. (Om Narayan Rai, J.) (Ravindra V. Ghuge) Chief Justice