Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3629/2026 of NABIBUL ISLAM @ SK NABIBUL ISLAM Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 7 October 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 16. Kausik (Allowed) CRM ( A ) 3629 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Panskura Police Station Case No. 454 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
07.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 16. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (A) 3629 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Panskura Police Station Case No. 454 of 2026 dated 17.06.2026 under Sections 341/506/34/120B of Indian Penal Code and Section 25/27(1) Arms Act.
And
In the matter of : Nabibul Islam @ Sk Nabibul Islam
……Petitioner.
Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta
Mr. Subhas Jana
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Kallol Kr. Basu
Ms. Pramita Banerjee
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the accusation against the petitioner is that he compelled the complainant to institute a false case.
State has submitted the case diary.
I have taken into account the statement of the victim lady who initiated the complaint.
Having regard to the nature of the complaint, I am of the opinion custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.
2
As such, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Nabibul Islam @ Sk Nabibul Islam be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Petitioner shall make himself available as and when called for by the investigating officer of the case. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3629 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)