Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3365/2026 of RINTU MAITY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 7 October 2026
Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Rejected In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.( A ) 3365 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Kharagpur
07.10.2026
Item No.125
Court No.37
(Bench ID-265691)
CHC
Rejected
In The High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M.(A) 3365 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Kharagpur Local Police Station Case No. 341 of 2026
dated
19.04.2026
under
Sections
329(3)/75(2)/76/78(2)/304(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and charge sheet has been submitted vide Charge Sheet No.539 of 2026 dated July 31, 2026 under Sections 329(3)/75(2)/76/78(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And
In the matter of: Rintu Maity
...… petitioner
Mr. Navanil De, Advocate
Ms. Monami Mukherjee, Advocate
.…for the petitioner
Mr. Bhaskar Seth, Advocate
Mr. Mukesh Kr. Gupta, Advocate
.…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Victim recorded her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS while she implicates the petitioner in outraging her modesty and tearing her garments in public.
3. Statement of the victim stands corroborated by independent witnesses who recorded statements under Section 180 of the BNSS.
4. Considering the gravity of the offence and involvement of the petitioner in the incident, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Consequently, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
2
6. CRM(A) 3365 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.08 13:16:15 +05'30'