Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3278/2026 of AVISMITH ROY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 7 October 2026
DL-48 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. ( A ) 3278 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with
07.10.2026
DL-48
Court No.37
[Bench ID-265691]
(AD)
(Allowed)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M. (A) 3278 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chandannagar Police Station Case No.17 of
dated
01.02.2026
under
Sections
85/316(2)/318(2)/338/336(3)/340(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, presently pending before the Court of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandannagar, Hooghly (corresponding to G.R. Case No.180 of 2026).
And
In the matter of: Avismith Roy
….petitioner
Mr. Ayan Basu, Advocate
Mr. Sumit Routh, Advocate
Mr. Sourav Bera, Advocate
Mr. Nilanjan Das, Advocate
…for the petitioner
Mr. Arka Mukherjee, Advocate
… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.
2. Petitioner is the husband.
3. Allegation against the petitioner relates to alleged torture to the victim at her matrimonial home as also forgery of certain documents.
4. So far as alleged forgeries are concerned, it appears that the petitioner made the downpayment for the vehicle which was taken on hire.
5. Allegation of forgery is in relation to the bank documents relating to a vehicle taken on hire.
6. Allegation with regard to the alleged torture apparently is vague and omnibus as appearing from the materials in the case diary.
7. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
8. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
9. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.
10. C.R.M. (A) 3278 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.07 19:48:34 +05'30'