Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3624/2026 of SUMANTA ROY AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.12 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. ( A ) 3624 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Goghat Police Station Case No. 432

07.10.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.12

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

Ct.No.35

dc.

Allowed

C.R.M. (A) 3624 of 2026

In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Goghat Police Station Case No. 432 of 2026

dated 13.07.2026 under Sections 318(4)/316(2)/108/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

(G.R.

Case

No.

1450/2026).

And

In Re :

Sumanta Roy and another

... Petitioners.

Mr. Suman Chakraborty

... For the Petitioners.

Mr. Amal Kumar Dutta,

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Gupta

... For the State.

Learned

advocate

appearing

for

the

petitioners

submits that petitioners have been implicated in connection with the instant case on the basis of apprehension by the informant.

Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produces the case diary.

I have taken into account the statement of the relation of the victim. Having considered the materials appearing in the case diary, I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioners in connection with the instant case is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners viz.,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Sumanta Roy and 2. Prasanta Roy shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioners shall report to the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days from date and thereafter on all subsequent dates fixed by the Investigating Officer, if required for the sake of investigation, till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional court. Memo of Evidence and status report submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 3624 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead