Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3282/2026 of ASHADUZZAMAN AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 7 October 2026
DL-51 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. ( A ) 3282 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of
07.10.2026
DL-51
Court No.37
[Bench ID-265691]
(AD)
(Allowed)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M. (A) 3282 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
in connection with Nalhati Police Station Case No.477 of
dated
01.09.2026
under
Sections
138/140(3)/305(a)/326(f)/111(2)/351(2)(3)/332(c) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act and Sections 4/5/6 of ES Act. GDE No.58/2026.
G.R No. 2387/26 dated 01.09.2026 now pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampurhat, Birbhum.
And
In the matter of: Ashaduzzaman & Anr.
….petitioners
Mr. Sabir Ali, Advocate
Mr. Amal Kumar Banerjee, Advocate
Ms. Suveni Banerjee, Advocate
…for the petitioners
Mr. Subhasish Panchal, Advocate
Ms. Pramita Banerjee, Advocate
… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record.
2. Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.
3. Petitioner no.1 apparently was the Sabhapati of a Panchayat Samity and petitioner no.2 was a follower of a political party.
4. Petitioners are accused in post poll violence.
5. There are accusations relating to Explosive Substances and under the Arms Act.
6. No recovery of explosive substances or any arms was made from the petitioners.
7. Issue of false implication remains.
8. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
9. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioners will report before the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
10. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.
11. C.R.M. (A) 3282 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.07 19:49:40 +05'30'