Calcutta High Court
WPA/24831/2026 of RAJESH KUMAR SHAW Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, STATE TAX, BALLYGUNGE CHARGE AND ORS on 6 October 2026
BR 05 WPA 24834of 2026 Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner , State Tax Ballygunje Charge & Ors. Mr. Abhijat Das, Mr. Anirban Chatterjee, Ms. Anwesha Chakraborty ….for the petitioner Mr. Uday Shankar Bhattacharya ….for the State 1. The matter has appeared in the list
14.10.2026
Ct. No.10
BR
WPA 24834of 2026
Rajesh Kumar Shaw
vs.
Assistant Commissioner , State Tax Ballygunje Charge & Ors.
Mr. Abhijat Das,
Mr. Anirban Chatterjee,
Ms. Anwesha Chakraborty
….for the petitioner
Mr. Uday Shankar Bhattacharya
….for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The matter has appeared in the list under the heading “To Be Mentioned‘ for correction of the order dated 6.10.2026
2. The name of the petitioner’s advocate has been wrongly written as ‘Abhijit Das ‘ in place and stead of ‘Abhijat Das’ in the order dated 06.10.2026, so the petitioner’s advocate name ‘Mr. Abhijat Das’ be incorporated in place of Mr. Abhijit Das.
3. In the fourth line of para 7 ,order dated 06.10.2026 the words ‘ The appeal has been rightly dismissed on limitations’ should be deleted and in place and stead of it should be’ ‘The order of adjudication has been rightly passed.
4. Other portions of the order dated 6.10.2026 shall remain same.
5. Department is directed to take steps accordingly.
(Smita Das De, J.)