Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/2036/2026 of RAHUL CHOWDHURY @ SUMAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 6 October 2026
no. 45 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 2036 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Serampore PS Case No. 757 of 2025 dated 14.12.2025 u/s 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
06.10.2026 Serial no. 45 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (NDPS) 2036 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Serampore PS Case No. 757 of 2025 dated 14.12.2025 u/s 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Rahul Chowdhury @ Suman
… Petitioner(s)
Ms. Jeenia Rudra Ms. Sukanya Banerjee
… for the Petitioner(s)
Dr. Achin Jana Mr. BIkash Kr. Singh
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in the instant case for alleged recovery of 2.1 litre of codeine mixture; charge-sheet has already been submitted, as such, the petitioner may be released on bail on any stringent condition. State opposes the prayer for bail and after perusing the Memo of evidence submits that there are 13 criminal antecedents of the present petitioner. The Memo of Evidence reflects the offences are predominantly under the Arms Act and dacoity. Having considered the same, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS)
of is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)