Calcutta High Court
WPCRC/231/2026 of APURBA PAYRA AND ANR. Vs SURBHI SINGLA, SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KHARAGPUR AND ANR. on 6 October 2026
COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Ct.19 06.10.26 Item No.7 Sws.M WPCRC 231 of 2026 Apurba Payra and Anr. Vs Surbhi Singla, Sub-Divisional Officer, Kharagpur and Anr. in WPA 6948 of 2025 Apurba Payra and Anr. Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Dibasish Basu
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Ct.19 06.10.26
Item No.7 Sws.M
WPCRC 231 of 2026
Apurba Payra and Anr.
Vs
Surbhi Singla, Sub-Divisional Officer, Kharagpur and Anr.
in
WPA 6948 of 2025
Apurba Payra and Anr.
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Dibasish Basu
Ms. Sneha dutta
Mr. Purnendu Das
….for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appears on behalf of the writ petitioners/applicants.
2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the alleged contemnors are present. The contemnors are however absent. On behalf of the contemnors, a compliance report dated 02.10.2026 is filed today which is taken on record.
3. It is submitted that from the compliance report dated 02.10.2026 it would reveal that the PWD authority has cleared the obstruction as shown by the petitioners. It is further submitted that the compliance report also Pbears the counter signature of the writ petitioners.
2
4. Such being the position, this Court finds nothing remains to be decided in the instant contempt application.
5. With the aforementioned observation, the instant contempt application is disposed of.
6. The Rule, as issued against the contemnors is/are discharged.
(Partha Sarathi Sen , J.)