Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2506/2026 of MAMUD SK @ MADUD SEKH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 6 October 2026
Court No.35. D/L.12. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 2506 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gazole Police Station case no. 525 of 2026 dated 29.05.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
06.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L.12. Rakib (Rejected)
CRM (M) 2506 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gazole Police Station case no. 525 of 2026 dated 29.05.2026 under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 read with Sections 137(2)/140(3)/70(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And In the matter of : Mamud Sk @ Madud Sekh
……Petitioner. Mr. Kalidas Saha Mr. Kushi Mollick Mr. Pikesh Kumar Chouhan
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Ms. Soma Mishra Chatterjee
……for the State. Mr. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen
......for the De-facto complainant.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested on 9th of July, 2026 and since then he is in custody. Learned advocate appearing for the De-facto complainant submits that the petitioner is equally responsible as the other accused persons who till date could not be traced out by the police authorities. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the Case Diary and drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS Having considered the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
2 Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 2506 of 2026 is rejected. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)