Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/2055/2026 of RAHUL AMIN MIA @ RAHUL AMIN MIAH @ RAHUL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.64 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 2055 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Gangarampur Police Station Case No. 741 of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
06.10.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.64
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 2055 of 2026
In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Gangarampur Police Station Case No. 741 of 2025 dated 22.11.2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/ 27A/28/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
And
In Re : Rahul Amin Mia @ Rahul Amin Miah @ Rahul
... Petitioner.
Mr. Kaushik Choudhury, Mr. Dwaipayan Panda
... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, APP, Mr. Amal Kumar Datta, Mr. S. S. Basu
... For the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject-matter of the present case relates to alleged recovery of 113 bottles of Phensedyl and petitioner is in custody for more than ten months. It has been submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no possibility of the trial concluding in near future as some of the accused persons are absconding. As such, petitioner prays for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the quantum of recovery in the present case is above commercial quantity. I have taken into account the quantum of seizure in the present case. A last opportunity is granted to the prosecution to split up the trial of the case and ensure that the stage of consideration of charges is completed by 15.12.2026. At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Petitioner will renew his prayer for bail after the aforesaid time period is over. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 2055 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. Learned advocate for the State is directed to communicate this order to the learned Trial Court. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)