Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1620/2026 of SK GAFFAR ALI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 5 October 2026
no. 59 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1620 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Canditala PS Cse No. 881 of 2024 dated 12.11.2024 u/s 85/103(1) of the BNS [GR No. 3308
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
05.10.2026 Serial no. 59 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1620 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Canditala PS Cse No. 881 of 2024 dated 12.11.2024 u/s 85/103(1) of the BNS [GR No. 3308 of 2024].
-And-
In the matter of : Sk. Gaffar Ali
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Partha Sarathi Das
… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Kalidas Saha Mr. Sanjib Das
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than one year ten months; charge-sheet has already been submitted and although the case was registered under section 302 of the IPC but charge-sheet has been submitted under section 306 of the IPC. State opposes the prayer for bail. It has also been brought to the notice of the court that the marriage was solemnized 18 years prior to the date of the incident. Having considered the overall circumstances, I am of the opinion that further custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.
Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Sk. Gaffar Ali shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned ACJM, Serampore, Hooghly. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Hooghly without prior permission of the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1620 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered as final opinion on the merits of the case. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)