Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/979/2026 of RONI MONDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 5 October 2026
no. 20 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM ( A ) 979 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Patiram PS Case no. 246 of2025 dated 08.09.2025 u/s 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A of the NDPS Act read with Section 14A(b)/14(c)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
05.10.2026 Serial no. 20 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (A) 979 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Patiram PS Case no.
of2025 dated 08.09.2025 u/s 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A of the NDPS Act read with Section 14A(b)/14(c) of the Foreigners Act [NDPS case no. 67 of 2025].
-And-
In the matter of : Roni Mondal
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kaushik Choudhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharyya, ld.APP Mr. Sankalpa Bhattacharjee
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the Petitioner submits that there has been no recovery from the present petitioner and he has been falsely implicated on the statement of co- accused. Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned APP, appears for the State along with a junior of his choice. The appointment of both Mr. Bhattacharjee and the junior of his choice, if any, be regularized by the concerned authority. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits a report which reflects that there are no criminal case against the present petitioner; neither any CDR nor any money trial has been traced. Having considered the overall circumstances, I direct that the petitioner be granted the relief of anticipatory bail. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner [Roni Mondal] be released on anticipatory bail subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As charge-sheet has already been submitted, this order of anticipatory bail will remain valid for a period of four weeks from date. Accordingly, CRM (A) 979 of 2026 is disposed of. Reports and the Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)