Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3076/2026 of HEDAYTULLA @ HEDAYETULLA MAHALDAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 1 October 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 4. Kausik (Rejected) CRM ( A ) 3076 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 149 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
01.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 4. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (A) 3076 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 149 of 2026 dated 08.03.2026 under sections 21/24 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 addition sections 303(2)/317(2)/317(4)/317(5)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 and section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
And In the matter of : Hedaytulla @ Hedayetulla Mahaldar
……Petitioner.
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee
Mr. Mizanur Rahaman
Mr. Sandipan Maity
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Ld. Junior Govt. Adv.
Ms. Namrata Chatterjee
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been foisted with the criminal case because of local dispute.
Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits a report wherein it is reflected that there is a previous antecedent of the petitioner in respect of same offences registered at Lalgola PS Case No. 972 of 2025.
2
Having considered the previous conduct of the petitioner including the antecedent, I am not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail.
As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of Hedaytulla @ Hedayetulla Mahaldar in CRM (A) 3076 of 2026 is dismissed. Report and Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)