Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3128/2026 of RAFIKUL MOLLA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 27 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM ( A ) 3128 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Basirhat PS Case No. 517 of 2026 dated 19.06.2026 u/s 64/351(2) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Rafikul Molla

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

01.10.2026 Serial no. 27 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)

CRM (A) 3128 of 2026

In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Basirhat PS Case No. 517 of 2026 dated 19.06.2026 u/s 64/351(2) of the BNS.

-And-

In the matter of : Rafikul Molla

… Petitioner(s)

Mr. Kallol Kumr Basu Md. Jannat ul Firdous Mr. Rajsekhar Hota

… for the petitioner(s)

Mr. Somopriyo Roy Chowdhury Mr. Supriya Mahajan

… for the State-respondent(s) Mr. T. M. Bahar

… for the o.p. no.2

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the victim is aged about 35 years as such she was able to understand the consequences of the act. There is a delay in lodging the FIR and the information furnished to the police authorities itself reflects that the victim was acquainted with the present petitioner. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. I have taken into account the statement of the victim under section 183 of the BNSS and on an assessment of the same, I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner [Rafikul Molla] be released on anticipatory bail subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner shall meet with the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days from date and, thereafter, on all subsequent dates as would be fixed by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation till the report in final form is submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3128 of 2026 is disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead