Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3126/2026 of SK. ASRAFUL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 1 October 2026
- 25 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 3126 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Burdwan Police Station Case
01.10.2026
Sl. No. - 25
Court No.35
Rohan
(Rejected)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 3126 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Burdwan Police Station Case No. 1121 of 2025 dated 01.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2)/140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Sk. Asraful
…Petitioner
Ms. Minoti Gomes
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Amitabha Karmakar
Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there was a consensual relationship for which both the petitioner and the victim fled away.
2. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary, drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS along with the medical report.
3. Having considered both the materials, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Sk. Asraful is rejected.
5. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 3126 of 2026 is dismissed.
2
6. Memo of evidence and the report submitted be kept with the record.
7. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)