Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3124/2026 of SEKH SAJAHAN AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 1 October 2026
no. 23 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM ( A ) 3124 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Jamalpur PS Cse No. 215 of 2026 dated June 3, 2026 u/s 126(2)/117(2)/308(5)/351(3)/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the matter
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
01.10.2026 Serial no. 23 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (A) 3124 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Jamalpur PS Cse No.
of dated June 3, u/s 126(2)/117(2)/308(5)/351(3)/3(5)of the BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Sekh Sajahan &Anr.
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay Ms. Rajashree Tah Ms. Trisha Rakshit Ms. Aishwarya Datta Ms. Bidisha Chakraborty Ms. SAdia Parveen
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Madan Mohan Roy Mr. Dipayan Dan
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are similarly situated as the other accused persons who have been granted anticipatory bail. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. I have taken into account the statement of Debabrata Seth. Having considered that the petitioners are similarly placed as the other accused who has been granted anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioners. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners [Sekh Sajahan and Sanjit Sahani] be released on anticipatory bail subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioners shall meet with the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days from date and, thereafter, on all subsequent dates as would be fixed by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation till the report in final form is submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3124 of 2026 is disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)