Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3426/2026 of MIR ROSWAN ALI @ RIPON Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 1 October 2026
(ct. no.34) (allowed) debajyoti IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction CRM( A ) 3426 of 2026 In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in
10.
01-10-2026
(ct. no.34)
(allowed)
debajyoti
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
CRM(A) 3426 of 2026
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section of
the
Code
of
Criminal
Procedure
corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Ketugram Police Station Case No.515 of 2026 dated 21-08-2026
under
Sections
109(1)/112(2)(b)/
115(2)/117(2)/3(5)/308(2)/326(g)/329(4)/76 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
- A n d -
In the matter of : Mir Roswan Ali @ Ripon
.... Petitioner.
Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Adv.,
Ms. Sadia Parveen, Adv.
… For the Petitioner.
Mr. Subhabrata Chowdhury, Adv.,
Mr. Saswata Chatterjee, Adv.
… For the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Apprehending arrest in connection with Ketugram Police Station Case No.515 of 2026 dated 21-08-2026, the petitioner has come up before this Court. A political rivalry is apparent from the materials available. Several other criminal cases have been filed against the present petitioner since after the change of regime, which have been initiated from June, 2026 onwards.
2. Learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that in all the cases, the petitioner is enjoying bail. The allegation prima facie is of the year 2021 and no prior complaint can be found.
3. On behalf of the prosecution, objection has been raised to the prayer for anticipatory bail, as there are antecedents of the present petitioner.
4. Having heard the submission of the learned advocates for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials on record and in absence of any specific role attributed by the present petitioner in terms of the complaint, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to an order of anticipatory bail, as prayed for.
5. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Mir Roswan Ali @ Ripon, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioner shall abide by the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Further, the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer once in a week, until further orders, and shall also cooperate with the investing agency.
6. In the event the petitioner failed to adhere to any of the conditions stipulated above, the learned court will be at liberty to cancel the anticipatory bail without further reference of this Court.
7. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
8. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
9. Criminal Section is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
[Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.]