Calcutta High Court
CRR/670/2024 of GURPAL SINGH AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 1 October 2026
nos. 99 [AN] Ct. No. - 39 CRR/670/2024 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 -And- In the matter of : GURPAL SINGH & ANR. … … Petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mr. Subhamoy Patra Ms. Mahuya Maity …For the petitioners. Mr. Gouranga Kr.
01.10.2026
Serial nos. 99
[AN]
Ct. No. - 39
CRR/670/2024
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
-And-
In the matter of : GURPAL SINGH & ANR.
… … Petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Kumar
Mr. Subhamoy Patra
Ms. Mahuya Maity
…For the petitioners.
Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das
Mr. Amal Kr. Dutta
Mr. Ayan Mitra
… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This revisional application has been filed by the two accused persons under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of the proceedings being Tiljala Police Station F.I.R. No. 208 dated 13th June, 2023 under Section 419, 323, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Learned advocate representing the State produces the memo of evidence, the case diary and submits that the final report that has already been submitted before the learned trial court has “mistake of facts” and the Investigation Officer prays before the learned trial court that the accused persons may be discharged from this case due to want of evidence. The memo of evidence filed by the State is taken on record.
3. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, there is nothing further remains to decide this case.
4. Accordingly, CRR 670 of 2024 stands disposed of with a liberty to approach before the learned trial court for appropriate order.
5. Connected applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned trial court for necessary compliance.
8. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
9. The concerned Department is directed to supply urgent certified Photostat copy of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) 2