Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3092/2026 of MD. HOSSAIN @ TUMPA SK. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 1 October 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 5. Kausik (Allowed) CRM ( A ) 3092 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 149 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
01.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 5. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (A) 3092 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 149 of 2026 dated 08.03.2026 under sections 21/24 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 addition sections 303(2)/317(2)/317(4)/317(5)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 and section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
And
In the matter of : Md. Hossain @ Tumpa Sk.
……Petitioner.
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee
Mr. Mizanur Rahaman
Mr. Sandipan Maity
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Ld. Junior Govt. Adv.
Ms. Namrata Chatterjee
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been foisted with the present criminal case because of local issues.
State opposes the prayer for bail and submits a report. There are no criminal antecedents so far as the present petitioner is concerned as is reflected from the report submitted by the State.
2
Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Md. Hossain @ Tumpa Sk. be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As charge sheet has already been submitted, this order of anticipatory bail will remain valid for a period of 6 weeks. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3092 of 2026 is allowed. Report and Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)