Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1980/2026 of WASAF SK @ WASAF ALI @ WASEF ALI @ ASHIKUL SK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 30 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 13. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 1980 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 74 of 2001 dated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
30.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 13. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (M) 1980 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 74 of 2001 dated 26.07.2001 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
And In the matter of : Wasaf Sk @ Wasaf Ali @ Wasef Ali @ Ashikul Sk.
……Petitioner.
Mr. Tapodip Gupta
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Md. Wasim Akram
Ms. Sabrina Parveen
……for the Defacto Complainant.
Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Ld. APP
Ms. Tanusree Kar
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for about 6 months. Charge sheet has been submitted. As such further detention of the petitioner is unwarranted.
State and the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for bail.
I find that the petitioner was absconding for 25 years and has been very recently arrested. Considering the fact of absconsion, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
2
As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
Accordingly, CRM (M) 1980 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)