Calcutta High Court
/3069/2026 of BANIBALA DAS AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 30 September 2026
no. 587 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM ( A ) 3069 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Patashpur PS Case No. 215 of 2026 dated 16.05.2026 u/s 137(2)/140(3)/3(5) of BNS. -And- In the matter of : Banibala
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
30.09.2026 Serial no. 587 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (A) 3069 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Patashpur PS Case No. 215 of 2026 dated 16.05.2026 u/s 137(2)/140(3)/3(5) of BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Banibala Das &Anr.
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Abhra Mukherjee Mr. Pranati Goswami Mr. Sauradeep Dutta Mr. A. Mukherjee Mr. Tanay Sen
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Mr. Sreyash Kumar Singh
… for the State-respondent(s)
The petitioners are the parents of the boy who eloped with the daughter of the informant. There is statement that the petitioners were aware relating to the incident. However, having considered the locus of the petitioners being the parents, I am of the opinion that they may be granted anticipatory bail on any stringent conditions. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is Allowed.
Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners [Banibala Das and Raghunath Das] be released on anticipatory bail subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation is still in progress, the petitioner no.2 shall meet with the Investigating Officer of the case twice a week and assist him for recovery of the daughter of the informant. So far as the petitioner no.1 is concerned, she shall not leave the jurisdiction of Patashpur police station without informing the concerned police station. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3069 of 2026 is disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)