Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1995/2026 of DEBA DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 30 September 2026
30.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 1995 of 2026 Deba Das Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya
D/L 22
30.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (M) 1995 of 2026
Deba Das
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Krishnaganj Police Station Case No. 104 of 2024 dated 23.03.2024 under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the IPC.
And
In the matter of : Deba Das
……Petitioner.
Mr. Sumanta Das
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Aditya Tiwari
Ms. Namrata Chatterjee
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than two years six months. Petitioner also submits that presently the presiding officer is not present. As such, petitioner may be released on bail.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that evidence of the prosecution witness have been completed and date has been fixed for examination of the accused persons under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3. Having considered the advance stage of the proceedings, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
4. Accordingly, C.R.M. (M) 1995 of 2026 is dismissed.
5. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
6. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)