Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1991/2026 of FEKAN MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 30 September 2026
no. 20 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1991 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Bhutni PSCase no. 38 of 2025 dated 15.03.2025 u/s
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
30.09.2026 Serial no. 20 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1991 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Bhutni PSCase no. 38 of 2025 dated 15.03.2025 u/s 103(1)/109/117(2)/117(3)/118(1)/118(2)/329(3)/3(5) of the BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Fekan Mandal
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Dattatreya Dutta Mr. Dibakar Sardar Mr. Monjit Bhattacharjee
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kallol Mondal Mr. Pawan Kr. Gupta Mr. Arijit Bhusan Bagchi
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than one year six months and the dispute relates to a land. The son of the petitioner also died. State produces the case diary and draws the attention of the court to the statement of the wife of the deceased. I have taken into account the narration of facts which categorically states regarding the manner of the commission of offence as well as dismemberment of vital parts of the body.
2 Having considered the same, I am not inclined to release the petitioenr on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the process of trial. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1991 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)