Calcutta High Court
WPA/9535/2026 of SUDIP BHATTACHARYA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 30 September 2026
Court No.24 pg. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 9535 of 2026 Sudip Bhattacharya -versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Pradip Kumar Panja Mr. Sayan Dev Kumar … For the petitioner Ms. Bhaswati Lahiri Ms. Kanika Gupta …
30.09.2026
Court No.24
pg.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 9535 of 2026
Sudip Bhattacharya
-versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Pradip Kumar Panja
Mr. Sayan Dev Kumar
… For the petitioner
Ms. Bhaswati Lahiri
Ms. Kanika Gupta
… For the State
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy
… For the WBCSSC
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavits of service filed in Court today be retained with the records.
2. The instant writ petition was filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction upon the West Bengal Central School Service Commission to permit the petitioner to participate in the counselling process dispensing with the requirement of submitting EWS certificate for the year 2024-2025.
3. Learned advocate representing the Commission submits, upon instruction that, in compliance of the direction passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court on 14th September, 2026 in FMA 1002 of 2026 with CAN 1 of 2026 & CAN 2 of 2026 (Mir Mazharul Islam & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.), the Commission has published a revised list of candidates wherein the name of the petitioner is appearing in the list of candidates selected for interview.
4. In view of the stand taken by the Commission in compliance of the direction passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench, the cause of action for filing the instant writ petition does not survive any further. The petitioner shall be permitted to participate in the interview in accordance with the revised interview list.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of.
6. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
7. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)