Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1979/2026 of FITU SK @ ALOM Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 30 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 12. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1979 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Suti Police Station Case No. 1015/2025 dated 26.08.2025 under
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
30.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 12. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (M) 1979 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Suti Police Station Case No.
dated 26.08.2025 under Sections 318(4)/336(2)/336(3)/340(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 13/14 of the Foreigners Act.
And In the matter of : Fitu Sk @ Alom
……Petitioner.
Dr. Achin Jana
Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh
Ms. Chetna Rustagi
Mrs. D. Mukherjee
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Sr. Govt. Adv.
Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than 13 months. Charge sheet has already been submitted on October, 2025 and till date charges have not been framed.
Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is involved in forging the documents. Materials have been collected against him. A Xerox copy of his Bangladeshi National Identity Card has been seized by the police authorities. Petitioner as such should not be released on bail.
Petitioner is in custody for 13 months. The case is based on documents. Having considered the prescribed punishment in the case for which the petitioner is to face the charges, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.
As such, petitioner, namely Fitu Sk @ Alom be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Jangipur.
If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Murshidabad without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court.
Additionally, petitioner shall furnish his address where he would be residing and meet with the Officer-in-Charge of Suti Police Station once a week till modified by the learned Trial Court.
With the aforesaid observations, CRM (M) 1979 of 2026 is allowed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered a final opinion on the merits of the case.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)