Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3119/2026 of SK RASIDUL ISLAM @ JWELL AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

30.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 3119 of 2026 Sk Rasidul Islam @ Jwell & Ors. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

D/L 613

30.09.2026

Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)

ct.no.35

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

C.R.M (A) 3119 of 2026

Sk Rasidul Islam @ Jwell & Ors.

Vs

The State of West Bengal

In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Saktigarh Police Station Case No. 170 of 2026 dated 23.05.2026 under Sections 448/384/427/506/34 of the IPC, 1860

And

In the matter of :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Sk Rasidul Islam @ Jwell

2. Raju Sk

3. Azad Rahaman Seikh

4. Sekh Kabir @ Sk Kabir @ Lalan

5. Sekh Momin @ Momin Sk

6. Ganesh Dutta

7. Babar Sekh @ Babar Sk

8. Habibul Mallick ……Petitioners. Mr. A. Bhattacharyya Ms. Anindita Mukherjee Mr. A. Das

…for the Petitioners Mr. L. Vishal Kumar Mr. Sanjib Das

…for the State

1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the incident referred to in the present FIR is of 2021.

2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3. Having considered the instant complaint is of 2021, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

4. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, 1. Sk Rasidul Islam @ Jwell 2. Raju Sk

3. Azad Rahaman Seikh 4. Sekh Kabir @ Sk Kabir @ Lalan

5. Sekh Momin @ Momin Sk 6. Ganesh Dutta 7. Babar Sekh @ Babar Sk 8. Habibul Mallick be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. As charge-sheet has been submitted this order of anticipatory bail will remain valid for a period of six weeks.

6. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3119 of 2026 is allowed.

7. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.

8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.

9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead