Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3107/2026 of PINTU SK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 30 September 2026
30.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 3107 of 2026 Pintu Sk Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under
D/L 601
30.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 3107 of 2026
Pintu Sk
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 2130 of 2025 dated 31.12.2025 under Sections 21(c)/27A/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
And
In the matter of : Pintu Sk
……Petitioner.
Mr. Md. Wasim Akram
Ms. Sabrina Parveen
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, A.P.P
Mr. Amal Kumar Datta
Ms. Nupur Chaudhuri
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and is apprehending that he may be arrested in connection with the instant case. Petitioner further submits that the total quantum of seizure is 10 kgs of brown sugar and there were subsequent recoveries after the initial seizure of 7.863 kgs of brown sugar.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioner is wanted in connection with the present case and there are three other criminal antecedents of the present petitioner which includes case under the provisions of the NDPS Act.
3. Having considered the antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner namely, Pintu Sk in CRM (A) 3107 of 2026 is dismissed.
5. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)