Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/2167/2026 of AA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.35. D/L. 1055. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 2167 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Deganga Police Station Case No. 11 of 2026 dated 08.01.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

30.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 1055. Kausik (Allowed)

CRM (M) 2167 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Deganga Police Station Case No. 11 of 2026 dated 08.01.2026 under Sections 87/103(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 10 of POCSO Act.

And In the matter of : AA

……Petitioner.

Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty

Mr. Shashanka Sekhar Saha

……for the Petitioner.

Mr. Amarta Ghose

Mr. Probal Das

……for the State.

Report submitted by the State reflecting that information was furnished with the informant be kept with the record. In spite of service none appears for the private opposite party no. 2.

State opposes the prayer for bail.

I have taken into account the statement of the mother of the deceased under Section 183 of the BNSS as also the post-mortem report. Petitioner is in custody since January 2026. Charge sheet has already been submitted.

Having considered the overall materials appearing against the petitioner, I am of the opinion further custodial

2 detention is uncalled for. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

As such, petitioner be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned CJM, Barasat, North 24 Parganas.

If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of North 24 Parganas without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court.

Accordingly, CRM (M) 2167 of 2026 is allowed.

The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered a final opinion on the merits of the case.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead