Calcutta High Court
CO/2911/2024 of SRI SRI DURGAMATA THAKURANI REP BY SREE GOUTAM MUKHERJEE Vs ADHAR NARAYAN MUKHERJEE AND ORS on 30 September 2026
OF 2024 30.09.2026 Sri Sri Durgamata Thakurani represented by Sebait and for himself Sree Goutam Mukherjee Sl no. 31 - Vs – Ct no. 2 Adhar Narayan Mukherjee (since deceased) Sri Sanjay Mukherjee & Ors. P.M. Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury, Ms. Esha Basak ...for the
C.O. 2911 OF 2024
30.09.2026
Sri Sri Durgamata Thakurani represented by Sebait and for himself Sree Goutam Mukherjee Sl no. 31
- Vs –
Ct no. 2
Adhar Narayan Mukherjee (since deceased)
Sri Sanjay Mukherjee & Ors.
P.M.
Mr. Dipanjan Datta,
Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury,
Ms. Esha Basak
...for the petitioner
Mr. Supriyo Chattopadhyay,
Ms. Debosri Chatterjee
... for WBSEDCL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the injunction application filed by the plaintiff/petitioner in Title Suit No. 74 of 2012 is decided expeditiously without being influenced by order of the learned Trial Judge dated 20th May, 2023 and order of the learned Appellate Court dated 28th July, 2023.
2. In view of the submissions made the matter is remanded back to the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Second Court Bolpur with a direction to decide the injunction application in Title Suit No. 74 of 2012 preferably within a period of three months in accordance with law after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard.
3. Learned Trial Court shall decide the injunction application independently without being influenced by its order dated 20th May, 2023 and order of the first appellate court dated 28th July, 2023. Learned Trial Court shall not grant in any unnecessary adjournment.
4. It is made clear, that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
6. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.) 2