Calcutta High Court

WPA/11867/2026 of BANDANA PAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.24 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION WPA 11867 of 2026 Bandana Pal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Srikanta Datta Mr. Pradyut Kumar Ray Ms. Aditi Chakraborty … for the Petitioner. Mr. Ankur Sharma … for the State. 1.

S/L 14

30.09.2026

Court No.24

SD

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

WPA 11867 of 2026

Bandana Pal

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Srikanta Datta

Mr. Pradyut Kumar Ray

Ms. Aditi Chakraborty

… for the Petitioner.

Mr. Ankur Sharma

… for the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept with the records.

2. The petitioner claims to be the widow daughter of a deceased Group-D staff of a school. She claims family pension meant for widow daughter. The application was made by the petitioner before the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Nadia. The same is alleged to be kept pending.

3. Learned advocate representing the State respondent relies upon the instruction forwarded by the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Nadia. The said Officer has mentioned that the petitioner was unable to produce supporting documents with regard to her claim.

4. The petitioner has annexed the death certificate of her husband, the legal heir certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat, the death certificate of her mother and the PPO of her mother along with the application seeking pension.

5. As it appears that the DI is yet to take a decision on the petitioner’s prayer, accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by directing the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Nadia to take a decision on the petitioner’s prayer for grant of family pension for widow daughter strictly in accordance with the prescribed rules at the earliest but positively within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

6. The DI shall intimate the petitioner the formalities and the documents that she is required to supply to the authority for approval of her prayer.

7. A reasoned order shall be passed by the DI and communicated to the petitioner.

8. If the prayer of the petitioner is allowed, then necessary consequential steps for releasing family pension shall be taken by the authority without any further delay.

9. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the application dated March 17, 2026 along with all annexures to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of the Court.

10. The writ petition stands disposed of.

11. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

12. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead