Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3059/2026 of SUJAY DE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 19. Kausik (Rejected) CRM ( A ) 3059 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Katwa Police Station Case No. 494/2026 dated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
29.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 19. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (A) 3059 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Katwa Police Station Case No. 494/2026 dated 26.06.2026 under section 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109(1)/329(4)/304(2) of BNS.
And In the matter of : Sujay De
……Petitioner.
Mr. Shataroop Purkayastha
Ms. Rajarna Mazumder
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Archisman Singh
Mr. Noor Ul Amin Sarder
….for the Defacto Complainant.
Mr. Biswajit Tiwari
Ms. Kritika Jain
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been foisted with a criminal case after there has been change in administration.
Learned advocate appearing for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the injuries which are inflicted are of 2026 and rest are incidents relating to 2021.
2
State has produced the case diary.
I have seen the injury report. The injury inflicted upon the injured is of 2026. Having considered the injuries sustained, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, CRM (A) 3059 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)