Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2461/2026 of SAKIB SAIKH @ SAKIL SAIKH Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 29 September 2026
no. 496 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 2461 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Krishnaganj PSCase No. 279 of 2024 dated 09.07.2024 u/s 137(2)/140(3)/65(1) of the BNS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
29.09.2026 Serial no. 496 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 2461 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Krishnaganj PSCase No. 279 of 2024 dated 09.07.2024 u/s 137(2)/140(3)/65(1) of the BNS and section 6 of the POCSO Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Sakib Saikh @ Sakil Saikh
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Saryati Dutta Mr. Amanul Islam
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Anindya Ghosh Mr. Pronojit Roy
… for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Sujoy Sarkar Mr. Sourav Mukherjee
… for the defacto-complainant
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for two years fifteen days. Five witnesses have been examined out of the 13 witnesses cited in the charge-sheet. Learned advocate for the defacto-complainant is present. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary as well as evidence.
2 Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2461 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)