Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3064/2026 of KHALEDA BEGAM AND ORS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 29 September 2026
29.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 3064 of 2026 Khaleda Begam & Ors. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
D/L 24
29.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 3064 of 2026
Khaleda Begam & Ors.
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Tarakeswar Police Station Case No. 199 of 2026 dated 08.05.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/351(3)/3(5) of the B.N.S, 2023.
And
In the matter of :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Khaleda Begam
2. Mir Rostam Ali
3. Amit Roy ……Petitioners. Mr. Sauradeep Dutta Mr. Himadree Ghosh
…for the Petitioners Mr. Amit Halder Mr. Deepak Khetawat
…for the State
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are similarly situated as Sk. Hasan Ali who has been granted anticipatory bail in C.R.M. (A) 2254 of 2026.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. I have taken into account the statement of the injured as also the injury report.
4. Having considered the locus of the present petitioners similar to Sk. Hasan Ali, I direct that petitioners be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.
5. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, 1. Khaleda Begam 2. Mir Rostam Ali
3. Amit Roy be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
6. As the investigation of the case is in progress, petitioner nos. 2 and 3, namely, 2. Mir Rostam Ali 3. Amit Roy shall make themselves available before the Investigating Officer within a period of ten days from the date of the order and shall subsequently follow the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Court.
7. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3064 of 2026 is allowed.
8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)