Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3089/2026 of SADHUCHARAN MANDAL AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 48. Kausik (Partly Allowed) CRM ( A ) 3089 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bhutni Police Station Case No. 67 of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
29.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 48. Kausik (Partly Allowed)
CRM (A) 3089 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bhutni Police Station Case No. 67 of 2026 dated 25.05.2026 under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/109/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
And In the matter of : Sadhucharan Mandal & Ors.
……Petitioners.
Mr. Md. Wasim Akram
Ms. Sabrina Parveen
……for the Petitioners.
Mr. Shourjyo Mukherjee
Mr. Rohan Bavishi
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that over land dispute a scuffle took place and petitioners have been foisted with the criminal case.
State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and draws the attention of the Court to the injury report and the nature of the incident which took place.
Having considered the materials appearing in the case diary and taking into account the age of petitioner no. 1, his prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.
2
So far as petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 are concerned, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner no. 1, namely, Sadhucharan Mandal be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Petitioner no. 1 shall make himself available as and when required by the investigating officer for the sake of investigation. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3089 of 2026 is partly allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)