Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3090/2026 of SAMIRAN MONDAL AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 49. Kausik (Partly Allowed) CRM ( A ) 3090 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gangajal Ghati Police Station Case No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
29.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 49. Kausik (Partly Allowed)
CRM (A) 3090 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gangajal Ghati Police Station Case No. 122 of 2026 dated 29.06.2026 under Section 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109(1)/74/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
And In the matter of : Samiran Mondal & Ors.
……Petitioners.
Mr. Soumik Ganguli
Ms. Priti Burman
……for the Petitioners.
Mr. Anamitra Banerjee
Mr. Utsav Dutta
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits petitioners and the family of the informant were involved in a scuffle. Pursuant to which injury was sustained by both the parties.
State opposes the prayer and submits that four persons were injured. Kartik Bauri was severely injured. There were other injured persons. The injury reports along with statements are available.
2
Having considered the locus of each of the petitioners separately, I find that so far as petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, their prayer for anticipatory bail is to be rejected.
So far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, his prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner no. 1, namely, Samiran Mondal be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Petitioner no. 1 will meet with the investigating officer within a period of 10 days and thereafter on all subsequent dates fixed by the investigating officer till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Court. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3090 of 2026 is partly allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)