Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3068/2026 of MUSARAF HOSSAIN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
29.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 3068 of 2026 Musaraf Hossain Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/
D/L 28
29.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 3068 of 2026
Musaraf Hossain
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Sagardighi Police Station Case No. 24 of 2026 dated 15.01.2026 under Sections 112(2)(b)/316(2)/318(2)/318(4) of the BNS, 2023.
And
In the matter of : Musaraf Hossain
……Petitioner.
Ms. Rimisha Bhadra
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, A.P.P
Ms. Arushi Rathore
Mr. Dipayan Dan
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that because of non-payment petitioner has been foisted with a criminal case.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. I have taken into account the conduct of the petitioner. Similar nature of cases are pending against the present petitioner. In the memo of evidence State has submitted list of such criminal antecedents which include nine criminal cases of similar nature being registered at Sagardighi police station.
4. Having considered the conduct of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner namely, Musaraf Hossain in CRM (A) 3068 of 2026 is dismissed.
6. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
7. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)