Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3084/2026 of SAHADEB METE AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 43. Kausik (Allowed) CRM ( A ) 3084 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Khandaghosh Police Station Case No. 137 of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
29.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 43. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (A) 3084 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Khandaghosh Police Station Case No. 137 of 2026 dated 14.05.2026 under Sections 126(7)/117(7)/109(1)/308(7)/351(3)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 25/27 of the Arms Act.
And In the matter of : Sahadeb Mete & Anr.
……Petitioners.
Mr. Samrat Choudhury
Ms. Anju Sahani
……for the Petitioners.
Mr. Pradip Banerjee, Ld. APP
Mr. Rajesh Kr. Shah
Mr. Deepak Khetawat
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been foisted with the present criminal case because of private and personal grudge.
State has produced the case diary.
I have taken into account the materials appearing as well as complicity of the present petitioners. Having considered the materials, I am of the opinion custodial detention of the present petitioners are not warranted.
2
As such, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, (1) Sahadeb Mete, (2) Raju Mete be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is in progress, petitioner shall report to the investigating officer within a period of 10 days and on all subsequent dates fixed by the investigating officer till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Court. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3084 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)