Calcutta High Court
CO/3375/2026 of SUKDEB BARMAN Vs KAKALI BARMAN MANNA on 29 September 2026
Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 3375 of 2026 Dr. Sukdeb Barman Vs. Smt. Kakali Barman Manna None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. No accommodation has been sought for either. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband praying for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
D/L- 18 29/09/2026 Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 3375 of 2026
Dr. Sukdeb Barman Vs. Smt. Kakali Barman Manna
None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. No accommodation has been sought for either. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Raiganj, District-Uttar Dinajpur to dispose of Matrimonial Suit No.80 of 2014 expeditiously. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite party. However, the learned advocate for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite party or the learned advocate representing the opposite party before the learned trial judge. CO 3375 of 2026 stands disposed by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Raiganj, District-Uttar Dinajpur to take up the hearing of the petition on September 29, 2026 and make an endeavour to dispose of the said petition as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. After disposal of the said application and any other interlocutory applications, that may be pending, the
2
learned trial judge shall make an endeavour to dispose of the Matrimonial Suit No.80 of 2014 as expeditiously as possible provided the husband-petitioner is not in default in complying with any order passed for alimony pendente lite or maintenance. There will be no order as to costs. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)