Calcutta High Court

CO/559/2026 of NIRMAL KUMAR KOTHARI @ NIRMAL KOTHARI Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

sg 29-09-2026 Ct. 6 CO 559 of 2026 Nirmal Kumar Kothari @ Nirmal Kothari Versus State of West Bengal & Anr. [ Mr. Sukanta Chakrabarty Mr. Anindya Halder Mr. Ronit Deyashi Mr. Subhajit Nandi …for the petitioner Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that this is an

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Item- A-

364. sg

29-09-2026

Ct. 6

CO 559 of 2026

Nirmal Kumar Kothari @ Nirmal Kothari Versus State of West Bengal & Anr.

[

Mr. Sukanta Chakrabarty Mr. Anindya Halder Mr. Ronit Deyashi Mr. Subhajit Nandi

…for the petitioner

Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that this is an application praying for expeditious hearing of the withdrawal application. Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there has been unnecessary delay in disposal of the application for withdrawal of the decreetal amount in LA Execution Case No. 97 of 2018 pending before the learned Additional 5th Special LA Judge (4th Additional District Judge), Alipore, South 24 Parganas. By drawing the attention of the court to the various orders Mr. Chakraborty submits that repeated dates were fixed for clarification regarding the assignee and the assignor. He submits that the next date has been fixed in the execution case on October 9, 2026. Mr. Chakraborty submits that the issue with regard to whether the assignee or the assignor is entitled to the decreetal amount has already been decided and it is only the withdrawal application which is pending. In the light of the submission made by Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, liberty is granted to the petitioner to produce the material records/documents before the learned Judge in support of his contention that the issue with regard to assignee or assignor

2 has already been clarified at an earlier stage. The learned executing court is directed to dispose of the application for withdrawal of the decreetal amount within a period of eight weeks from the next date fixed without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. The learned executing court is further directed to take note of the order no. 6 dated June 24, 2019 passed in LA Execution Case No. 97 of 2018.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead