CO/245/2026 of JAYANTA SHASMAL AND ORS. Vs RANJIT KUMAR BOWLIA AND ORS. on 29 September 2026

Item- A-

785. sg

29-09-2026

Ct. 6

CO 245 of 2026

Jayanta Shasmal & Ors. Versus Ranjit Kumar Bowlia & Ors.

[

Mr. Sorsis Das

Mr. L. Haque

…for the petitioners

This application under Article of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendants praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court at Barasat, to dispose of the interlocutory applications filed in Title Suit No. 1467 of 2025, expeditiously. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the application filed by the petitioners under Order 39 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure is pending. He further submits that another application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code is also pending. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to serve notice upon the opposite parties. However the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order to the opposite party forthwith. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, this civil revision application stands disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court at Barasat, to make an endeavour to dispose of the pending interlocutory applications filed in the Title Suit Title Suit no. 1467 of 2025 as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to

either of the parties. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)