Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3079/2026 of SURU MONDAL AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
29.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 3079 of 2026 Suru Mondal & Anr. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
D/L 39
29.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 3079 of 2026
Suru Mondal & Anr.
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Basirhat Police Station Case No. 951 of 2025 dated 06.10.2025 under Sections 21c/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,
1985.
And
In the matter of :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Suru Mondal
2. Tina Gazi ……Petitioners. Ms. Malashree Ghosh
…for the Petitioners Mr. Rajashree Venket Kundalia Mr. Somnath Bera
…for the State
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been foisted with a criminal case on the basis of statement of co-accused.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioners were initially named in the FIR.
3. Records do not reflect that there are any criminal antecedents of the petitioners or any money trail or CDR is available in the present case.
4. Having considered the same the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.
5. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, 1. Suru Mondal 2. Tina Gazi be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
6. As charge-sheet has already been submitted this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of six weeks.
7. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3079 of 2026 is allowed.
8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)