Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3103/2026 of PARIMAL BAIDYA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
- 62 Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 3103 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gaighata Police Station Case
29.09.2026
Sl. No. - 62
Court No.35
Rohan
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 3103 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gaighata Police Station Case No. 618 of 2026
dated 08.07.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/115(2)/76/3(5)
of
the
Bharatiya
Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Parimal Baidya
…Petitioner
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee
Ms. Ankusha Ghosh
…for the Petitioner
Ms. Arushi Rathore
Mr. Saswata Chatterjee
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being foisted with a criminal case because of grudge.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that there are criminal antecedents of similar nature by the present petitioner.
3. Having considered the same, the subject matter of the case, on stringent condition, petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.
4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Parimal Baidya is allowed.
5. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer of
2 the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
6. Additionally, the petitioner shall stay outside the jurisdiction of Gaighata Police Station, inform his address to the Investigating Officer of the case and report to the Investigating Officer once in every 10 days till the report in final form is submitted before the Jurisdictional Court.
7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 3103 of 2026 is disposed of.
8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)